Monday, February 11, 2008
The King James Version
The King James Bible was published almost 397 years ago.
At the time, words like “doth” and “sayeth” were no longer used. In fact, they hadn’t been common for many years. But the authors wanted to give the book the sound of an ancient document.
The influence of the King James bible on our culture and language is considerable. This is especially obvious in the liturgies and beloved hymns of churches.
Fondness for the King James version sometimes goes too far. This is usually harmless, even amusing. For example, you can sometimes hear people pray using words from the King James--“thee,” “thou,” “leadeth” and “wouldst.”
I think the unconscious assumption is that King James English is God’s language. So God will understand you if you use it when you pray.
Due to the fact that the King James bible was used for hundreds of years to teach English to children, its rhythms, poetry and images have become embedded in our language. It was the bible that accompanied the westward expansion across the U.S., and so is part of our history.
It is beautifully and vividly written, and has been mined extensively for creative inspiration.
But respect and affection for this book are sometimes taken way too far. For example, some congregations and individuals consider the King James bible to be the only “true” bible. This is logically impossible, of course, unless you assume the book dropped out of the sky in 1611, and was therefore not based on any previous bibles.
And unless you assume that God speaks only English. King James English.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Photo relevance:
(i) A pillar of salt?
(ii) Do I take what you say with a grain of salt?
(iii) Not a salt shaker?
Disconcerting picture (inconsistent shadows) – if there is a point, it did not prick me.
Thanks for commenting! Good pickup on the shadows.
To quote a line from the movie "The Big Chill": "You are so analytical. Some times you need to let art wash over you."
Enjoy the day.
Post a Comment